The Mathrooms is my website for maths which is usable as both a teaching resource and a way to self study Mathematics. Here I always try to explain the why behind stuff. And I also try to explain it at the level where you have to use the stuff, even if this means explanations are long and complicated as I have to develop some theory. I want to eliminate the frustrating experience I've had where I search for the proof of a result applied at A level but all the proofs that exist assume undergraduate background. Also, my video on arithmetic and algebra basics (See level 1) was designed to address many pitfalls and sources of confusion I've seen from people who struggle with maths. In general, the supplementary videos on this website are an informal (compared to the written notes) treatment of topics that still explain the "why".
NOTE: All videos on this website will be replaced with written notes after levels 1-9 are finished and mistakes corrected.
This website also showcases all the maths that I personally know from first principles which is always growing. I was originally making notes to keep my own maths knowledge and proof dependencies organized but eventually noticed that these turned into useful materials that I wish I had when I was an A level student, which is what inspired me to make this. This website is more about building mathematical theory and understanding from first principles and less about how to apply it to the real world or how to do it in a way that will make examiners happy. If you like applied maths or physics this may not be for you, but if you like proofs you should love this.
Sublevels marked bonus are not strictly needed for progression (and if a result from there is needed it will either be moved or explicitly stated) and are optional. These include results that are not part of the core syllabus that I wanted to include.
While rigor is very important in the Mathrooms, this is not a formal logic website, so at some point we do use common sense. I don't insist on proving things that have been proven IF they are sufficiently obvious. For example, I don’t think proof is needed to convince you of the intermediate value theorem, which says that a graph that you draw without taking your pen off the paper that goes from an altitude of 0 meters to 2 meters has a point on it at an altitude of 1 meter (although in that particular case we do formalize it in the level 7 analysis course since I think it's interesting to think about "what does it mean for something to be continuous" and think about how to make that more precise than "you can draw it without lifting your pen"). Note however that anything less obvious than this assertion is probably something we justify here, since intuition can fail..
Some proofs are deferred to later levels (usually to levels 4 and 6 and in other rare cases when I really think it's best) to cater to people who just want to pass in school and not necessarily understand all the proofs, and when this happens I point it out explicitly.
You can contact me at mathsorgerorg@gmail.com to suggest better proofs or explanations, correct errors, or just to chat!
I'm currently a maths undergraduate at the university of Cambridge and I've been passionate about Maths for my entire life. I also know pi to 10000 decimal places which is cool and actually was surprisingly fun to do.